Camera: 50+ year-old Agfa Super Isolette 120 folder with Kodak Portra 160VC.
I’m selling my MP .85. Details in the L-Camera-Forum classifieds.
NASA’s website reports the death of a photographer who documented the birth of the space age. The space agency says Bill Taub died on February 20, which would have made him about 86 or 87.
Taub owed his career at NASA to his ingenuity and his Leica.
During World War II, NACA (NASA’s forerunner) hired him and his brother as artists to document flight tests at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. In his spare time he liked to take pictures and by chance took on a challenge that had stumped the staff photographers — getting a shot of a spark inside the cylinder of an engine. Taub told the story as part of NASA’s oral history project in 2006 (link here), saying NACA spent “hundreds of thousands of dollars” on lighting gear designed by Harold Edgerton but the NACA staff photogs, armed with 8X10 view cameras, could never get the shot. Taub and his brother decided it was a job for their Leicas. They used an f/2 lens and came up with their own developer formula to raise their film speed from ASA 100 to ASA 1600 (outrageously fast at the time). The Taubs got the shot and Bill’s career was launched.
He went on to become NASA’s first senior photog and covered everything from the naming of the Mercury 7 to the Challenger disaster. He also claimed to have taken the last official photo of John Kennedy — during a White House event right before Kennedy left D.C. for his campaign trip (therefore not an “official” event) to Dallas in November ‘63.
Much of Taub’s output was, like the Mercury 7 picture here, basic PR work but he stressed in the NASA oral history interview that he was an artist. The wind tunnel picture above is testament to that. The subject is fundamentally an industrial tool but Taub’s photo is composed and lit beautifully, emphasizing the machine’s exquisite curves.
Taub may have had the best photo gig of the 20th Century. He witnessed every stage of the journey to the moon up close, from the first Saturn V launch to the Apollo 11 crew’s ticker tape parade.
Here’s a link to NASA’s slide show of Taub’s pictures. I only wish there were more there.
We spend far too much time obsessing over equipment. It’s fun, sure, but worrying endlessly about whether lens A is sharper than lens B is silly if not a sign of a lonely, fetishistic existence.
So when I ran across this thread on the L-Camera-Forum I was thrilled. Anydm911 started it a couple of weeks ago with a post praising the results of his M8 and a 28/5.6 Summaron from decades ago. It set off a great series of posts showing off pictures taken with ancient Leica glass, ancient Nikon glass and ancient whoeverheard of it glass. The point isn’t how the sharpness of these lenses compares with the latest $5,000 ASPH Leica versions. Some compare well, some look really soft. The point is this obsession doesn’t matter. It’s the vision that went into the taking of the picture.
So if you’re obsessing over whether to spend $3695 on a brand new Summilux 50mm or a brand new 50mm Summicron for only $1995, stop. Think about an old 1.5 Summarit 50mm for about $500 instead. Or an ugly old screw-mount Summarit and an adapter for $200+. And spend the time you saved worrying about the glass thinking about how to make better pictures.
(By the way, the square format pictures you see on this blog have been taken with a 50+ year old 120 folder, an Agfa Super Isolette, which cost less than your average used Summicron 50mm in bargain condition.)
British Journal of Photography, a fantastic magazine, which claims to be the world’s longest running photo magazine, is going from weekly to monthly. The editors are putting the best face on it (see their web story on the change here) but it’s a shame. The best thing about its print version is its frequency. These days so much gets on the web so fast that monthly photo magazines seem pretty stale by the time they land in your mailbox or on newsstand shelves. I subscribed to BJP for several years in spite of the expense of subscriptions here in the U.S. and I still miss its weekly presence in my mailbox.
British media have been reporting frequently on people taking pictures who’ve been detained and even arrested by British police, usually under the authority of anti-terrorism laws (Section 44). The Guardian reports on one case in which the photographer managed to record video of the confrontation, including the Kafka-esque dialogue he had with the police, who justified the arrest by accusing the man of “anti-social behaviour” because he was taking pictures of a Christmas festival. First they said he was behaving suspiciously by photographing the festival and when that didn’t work they brought out the anti-social line. The weapon he apparently used to execute this act of anti-social behavior: a Leica M9. Here’s a link to the Guardian’s video story.
Nikon guru Thom Hogan’s essay on Luminous Landscape and Michael Reichmann’s open letter to Leica set off the typical absurd, Luddite rants at L-Camera Forum and rangefinderforum.
The idea of changing anything about the M line sends these pathetic fetishists into night terrors.
Just a quick look at the reactions to Hogan’s suggestions gives you a clear picture of what Leica is up against when it considers doing anything new. Hogan offers a notion about a hybrid rangefinder/electronic viewfinder that would let a future M camera use longer lenses. Here’s one line from the start of the rangefinderforum thread, “If you want to use long lenses use your stinkin’ DLSR!”. Of course, this misses the point entirely. Hogan is a nature/wildlife photog and spends days hauling his heavy DSLR crap into the wilds of whoknowswhere. He’d love a more portable solution than monstrous DSLR gear. In fact, Barnack came up with the Ur Leica for the same reason. Other posters reject all possible change, saying “Enough of “those” cameras already exist. Leave the M be. Some of us chose it for EXACTLY the reasons it “needs fixin’” or “conjecture and sooth saying is [sic] best left to those “psychics” that have the neon signs in their home windows.” Try this one for a fine display of no imagination whatsoever: “And it seems to me that the technological complexity of such a device would make it very costly if not unfeasible.” As if the M9 isn’t the perfect expression of why that notion is truly idiotic. Four years ago they said the M8 couldn’t be done and two years ago they said the M9 couldn’t be done for the same reasons. And here we are. They’re expensive, but they take great pictures.
What a bunch of pinheaded posts. Leica is researching a new focusing solution – Leica CEO Rudi Spiller said so on 9/9/09 – and it’s entirely possible that it will change the game the same way Barnack’s invention did nearly 100 years ago. If that means the M camera morphs into something different and better, so be it.
Will your latest digicam last 171 years? Westlicht, the auction house, is promoting its May 29 sale which features the oldest-known commercially-produced camera, a wooden, Daguerreotype Giroux made in 1839. Westlicht says this model was the first commercially-produced camera. When Louis Daguerre perfected his photographic process the French government bought the patent rights from him and made the secret of photography a gift to the world (would anyone be so generous now?). Daguerre got a fat pension but also went into business making camera equipment – the maker’s mark on the side of the camera being auctioned includes Daguerre’s autograph. In 1839 if you wanted to buy the camera, including all the equipment needed to make your plates and process them, it would have cost you 400 Francs. According to Westlicht that was a working man’s annual salary back then, so I guess it was the $23,000 Leica S2 of its day. Westlicht expects this camera to go for between 500,000 and 700,000 Euros. An original instruction book, in German, is included.
Trolling through photo blogs a few days ago led me to Jim Richardson’s blog which features some pictures of his that appear in the current issue of National Geographic. The pics are gorgeous and illustrate a story about Scotland’s Outer Hebrides. Having been there several times I picked up a copy of the magazine expecting a long, thorough story on the islands, their history, culture and current state. What I got was about four pages of text and Richardson’s fine pictures. The article is not much more than you’d find in a travel magazine, nothing like Nat Geo’s traditional in-depth reporting. A big disappointment (I also feel as if Nat Geo is using thinner paper and has cheapened the reproduction quality of the photos but that could be my imagination — pictures look zippier online). There’s a lot to be said about the Western Isles but you won’t find it in National Geographic. In case you’re interested here are my pictures of Harris and St. Kilda. But they’re nowhere near as good as Richardson’s.
The British Journal of Photography reports the death of Bob Willoughby, “Hollywood’s most celebrated photographer.” BJP notes his passing and reruns a 2004 profile but no pictures. So check out Willoughby’s website — wonderful stuff. Willoughby was 82 and according to BJP he was a sharp business person on top of making great pictures. Played the game well enough to escape with his wife and family to an Irish castle in 1972. Sweet.